Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Narukawa, Takafumi; Hamaguchi, Shusuke*; Takata, Takashi*; Udagawa, Yutaka
Nuclear Engineering and Design, 411, p.112443_1 - 112443_12, 2023/09
Times Cited Count:0 Percentile:0.01(Nuclear Science & Technology)Sawada, Atsushi; Sakamoto, Kazuhiko*; Watahiki, Takanori*; Imai, Hisashi*
SKB P-17-06, 154 Pages, 2023/08
Brumm, S.*; Gabrielli, F.*; Sanchez-Espinoza, V.*; Groudev, P.*; Ou, P.*; Zhang, W.*; Malkhasyan, A.*; Bocanegra, R.*; Herranz, L. E.*; Berda, M.*; et al.
Proceedings of 10th European Review Meeting on Severe Accident Research (ERMSAR 2022) (Internet), 13 Pages, 2022/05
Choi, B.; Nishida, Akemi; Li, Y.; Muramatsu, Ken*; Takada, Tsuyoshi*
Proceedings of 26th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-26) (Internet), 9 Pages, 2018/07
After the 2011 Fukushima accident, nuclear power plants are required to take countermeasures against accidents beyond design basis conditions. In seismic probabilistic risk assessment (SPRA), uncertainty can be classified as either aleatory uncertainty, which cannot be reduced, or epistemic uncertainty, which can be reduced with additional knowledge and/or information. To improve the reliability of SPRA, efforts should be made to identify and reduce the epistemic uncertainty caused by the lack of knowledge. In this study, we focused on the difference in seismic response by modeling methods, which is related epistemic uncertainty. We conducted a seismic response analysis with two kinds of modeling methods; a three-dimensional finite-element model and a conventional sway-rocking stick model, by using simulated various input ground motions, which is related to aleatory uncertainty. And then we quantified the seismic floor response results of the various input ground motions of each modeling methods. For the uncertainty quantification related to different modeling methods, we further perform a statistical analysis of the floor response results of the nuclear reactor building. Finally, we discussed how to utilize the results from these calculations for the quantification of uncertainty in fragility analysis for SPRA.
Zheng, X.; Ito, Hiroto; Tamaki, Hitoshi; Maruyama, Yu
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 53(3), p.333 - 344, 2016/03
Times Cited Count:10 Percentile:67.99(Nuclear Science & Technology)Homma, Toshimitsu
Proceedings of 4th International MACCS Users Group Meeting, p.57 - 66, 2002/10
no abstracts in English
Takeda, Seiji; Kimura, Hideo
JAERI-Research 2002-014, 20 Pages, 2002/07
no abstracts in English
M.Elert*; A.Butler*; J.Chen*; C.Dovlete*; A.Konoplev*; A.Golubenkov*; M.Sheppard*; Togawa, Orihiko; T.Zeevaert*
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 42, p.255 - 270, 1999/00
Times Cited Count:8 Percentile:23.84(Environmental Sciences)no abstracts in English
Murao, Yoshio
Konsoryu, 11(3), p.203 - 204, 1997/00
no abstracts in English
Togawa, Orihiko
Hoken Butsuri, 29, p.55 - 64, 1994/00
no abstracts in English
Homma, Toshimitsu; *
JAERI-M 93-207, 36 Pages, 1993/10
no abstracts in English
Homma, Toshimitsu; A.Saltelli*
EUR-13922, 33 Pages, 1992/00
no abstracts in English
Togawa, Orihiko
Hoken Butsuri, 24, p.166 - 169, 1989/00
no abstracts in English
Zheng, X.; Sugiyama, Tomoyuki
no journal, ,